• 

Hugo Parker, LLP successfully opposed plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate two asbestos-related cosmetic talcum powder cases for trial by convincing the Court that questions of fact in the cases “risk creating avoidable costs, confusion, delay, and raise the potential for prejudice during trial.”

By Frank|2024-01-09T23:44:32+00:00January 9, 2024|Uncategorized|

• 

Edward R. Hugo’s Commentary, Asbestos: The Devil is in the Dose II, is published by the DRI in the January issue of The Brief Case

By Frank|2025-08-26T19:56:17+00:00January 4, 2024|Uncategorized|

• 

A + B ≠ C + D: A Commentary on the Federal Asbestos Causation Standard by Edward R. Hugo is published by HARRISMARTIN

By Frank|2025-08-26T20:00:04+00:00December 27, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

Edward R. Hugo successfully defended the firm’s defense verdict in Spurlin v Foster Wheeler before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal

By Frank|2023-12-01T22:18:19+00:00November 22, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

Hugo Parker Wins Complete Defense Verdict!

By Frank|2025-08-26T19:08:57+00:00November 22, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

The DRI Published “Anchoring in Voir Dire and Opening Statements Precluded by Federal Court” by Edward Hugo in the November/December issue of The Brief Case

By Frank|2025-08-26T20:04:22+00:00November 14, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

Edward R. Hugo’s Commentary Regarding Precluding Anchoring in Voir Dire and Opening Statements is Published by HARRISMARTIN

By Frank|2025-08-26T20:05:48+00:00November 14, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

Federal Court Precludes Anchoring in Voir Dire and Opening Statements

By Frank|2023-09-23T02:14:39+00:00September 23, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

Hugo Parker Wins Summary Judgment For Farm

By Frank|2023-09-23T02:18:33+00:00September 23, 2023|Uncategorized|

• 

The DRI published “Voir Diring For Dollars” by Edward R. Hugo in the September 2023 issue of The Brief Case

By Frank|2025-08-26T20:07:13+00:00September 23, 2023|Uncategorized|